BP Situational Judgement Test: practice questions & answers

BP's Situational Judgement Test (SJT) is a comprehensive assessment designed to evaluate candidates for Early Careers roles.
The test consists of 5 different scenarios, each containing up to 6 questions, and takes approximately 45 minutes to complete.
While untimed, candidates must respond to all questions, and the assessment includes two additional tasks at different points.
The test can be taken in different languages where applicable, and if candidates get locked out, the system automatically unlocks within 12 hours.

💡

The assessment environment and administration are carefully structured to ensure optimal performance.
Progress is tracked throughout the assessment, and a feedback report becomes available upon completion.
The test is powered by Aon and includes a tutorial section with example scenarios for practice.

Situation

In this BP SJT scenario, you encounter a situation where colleagues are discussing the installation of an unauthorized music streaming app on a work laptop, which violates BP's IT policy.
The scenario presents three distinct response options: sending a policy email, ignoring the situation, or engaging in a direct conversation. When analyzing this situation, it's crucial to consider both professional responsibilities and interpersonal dynamics.

Judgement

The most effective approach would be to politely join the conversation and address the situation directly.
This response demonstrates professional responsibility while maintaining positive workplace relationships.
A face-to-face conversation allows for immediate, respectful dialogue and shows leadership qualities aligned with BP's values of integrity and responsibility.
The conversation should be structured carefully: begin by acknowledging that you overheard the discussion, show understanding of their desire for music while working, then gently inform them about the policy violation and associated risks.
Offering alternative solutions and assistance in finding approved options helps maintain a constructive tone and supports colleagues in compliance.

What not to do

The other options present significant drawbacks. Sending an email with the IT policy, while documenting the issue, could be perceived as passive-aggressive and might damage workplace relationships.
Similarly, ignoring the situation fails to address potential security risks and demonstrates a lack of professional responsibility.
Both alternatives fall short of BP's expectations for employee conduct and leadership.
The email approach lacks personal touch and could create unnecessary tension, while ignoring the situation could enable further policy violations and neglect professional obligations to protect company interests.

Overall approach

The recommended implementation involves a step-by-step approach: first, approach colleagues casually and acknowledge overhearing their conversation;
Then, express understanding of their perspective while sharing knowledge about the policy;
Explain the security risks involved; and finally, offer constructive solutions and support in finding approved alternatives.
This approach effectively balances maintaining professional relationships with upholding company policy, demonstrates leadership and integrity, and provides practical solutions while protecting company interests.
The key is to remain supportive and solution-focused throughout the interaction, ensuring colleagues feel helped rather than criticized.
This method aligns with BP's values and expectations while effectively addressing the policy violation in a professional and constructive manner.

The test format focuses on realistic workplace situations that mirror daily experiences in a BP role.
Candidates must select actions they would prioritize in given situations and respond to messages sent to them.
For example, one scenario involves managing a request from a new team member while under time pressure, testing the candidate's ability to balance competing demands.
The assessment measures judgment in relevant job situations, evaluating decision-making skills, prioritization abilities, and alignment with BP's values and work culture.

Key components include selecting preferred actions in scenarios, responding to messages, and completing additional tasks.
Through these elements, the test evaluates how candidates balance various workplace demands, handle time pressure, support team members, and make decisions aligned with organizational goals.
This comprehensive approach allows BP to assess not only technical judgment but also interpersonal skills, time management, and cultural fit within the organization.